Basic Social Process to Strategic Organisational Process: Grounded Theory Development
There are no files associated with this record.
| Title | Basic Social Process to Strategic Organisational Process: Grounded Theory Development |
|---|---|
| Author | Wright, Owen; Parry, Kenneth William |
| Publication Title | 7th International Iinstitute for Qualitative Methodology Conference Advances in Qualitative Methods 13-15 July 2006 |
| Editor | Janice Morse |
| Year Published | 2006 |
| Place of publication | Alberta, Canada |
| Publisher | University of Alberta |
| Abstract | Grounded theory analysis ultimately derives a core category that explains a phenomenon under investigation (Glaser, 1992; Glaser & Strauss, 1967; Goulding, 2002). Historically these core categories are a single expression of a social process, representing a specific behaviour of an individual occurring over time. While grounded theory has traditionally been used by sociologists to investigate social processes within traditional contexts, contemporary exceptions are apparent. These exceptions have re-focussed grounded theory into areas such as management, marketing, strategic alliances and consumer behaviour (Goulding, 2002; Locke, 2001). The connecting similarity between these studies and traditional grounded theory is the focus on action/interaction between individuals, continuing the notion of a social process. Grounded theory analysis progressively integrates and saturates these interactive processes. The categories are then scrutinised and tested for any linkages so that higher levels of abstraction emerge until one overarching social process emerges which links all lower level concepts. This final category is known as a basic social process (Parry, 2004). While grounded theory has traditionally focussed on the interaction and social influence between individuals, the notion of applying the same method to inter-organisational (or brand) behaviour appears to be possible when logic is applied. An analogy is drawn between a basic social process and a superordinate organisational process; both being representations of influence over time. This argument therefore posits that many individuals, working in conjunction, directly influence an organisation to interact with other organisations at a macro level. Hence, if the 'mind' of an organisation could be derived in a similar fashion to that of an individual, grounded theory appears to be applicable. These definitions can be linked and appear to support an argument that an organisation's behaviour could be observed from a combination of individuals' actions and that subsequently action/interaction between organisations could take place. It is important to note that this concept of social process does not exclude the incorporation of psychological, structural or cultural constructs. Therefore, this paper is concerned with inter-organisational relationships and the subsequent incorporation of this strategy into grounded theory analysis. |
| Peer Reviewed | No |
| Published | Yes |
| ISBN | 16094069 |
| Conference name | Advances in Qualitative Methods |
| Location | Surfers Paradise, Queensland |
| Date From | 2006-07-13 |
| Date To | 2006-07-16 |
| URI | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/14715 |
| Date Accessioned | 2007-03-12 |
| Date Available | 2007-09-06 |
| Language | en_AU |
| Research Centre | Centre for Tourism, Sport and Services Research |
| Faculty | Griffith Business School |
| Subject | Marketing and Market Research |
| Publication Type | Conference Publications (Extract Paper) |
| Publication Type Code | e3 |
Please use this identifier to cite this record: http://hdl.handle.net/10072/14715
Griffith University copyright notice
Copyright in individual works within the repository belongs to their authors or publishers. You may make a print or digital copy of a work for your personal non-commercial use. All other rights are reserved, except for fair dealings or other user rights granted by the copyright laws of your country.
Back to top