The abolition of the GP fundholding scheme: a lesson in evidence-based policy making
There are no files associated with this record.
| Title | The abolition of the GP fundholding scheme: a lesson in evidence-based policy making |
|---|---|
| Author | Kay, Adrian |
| Journal Name | British Journal of General Practice |
| Year Published | 2002 |
| Place of publication | London |
| Publisher | Royal Society of General Practitioners |
| Abstract | The general practitioner (GP) fundholding scheme was introduced as part of the Conservative government's 1991 National Health Service reforms and abolished by the Labour government in 1998. This paper contends that the scheme was introduced and abolished without policy-makers having any valid evidence of its effects. In particular, it focuses on the salient features of the decision to abolish. These were: (a) that it was not based on evidence; (b) that it came relatively soon after the introduction of the scheme; and (c) the GP fundholding scheme was voluntary and increasing numbers of GPs were being recruited. The overtly political nature of the introduction of GP fundholding is already well documented and is important in understanding the lack of evidence involved in the development of the fundholding scheme. |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Published | Yes |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue Number | 475 |
| Page from | 141 |
| Page to | 144 |
| ISSN | 0960-1643 |
| Date Accessioned | 2006-07-21 |
| Date Available | 2008-02-14T08:21:26Z |
| Language | en_AU |
| Faculty | Griffith Business School |
| Subject | Public Policy |
| URI | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/16821 |
| Publication Type | Journal Articles (Refereed Article) |
| Publication Type Code | c1x |
Please use this identifier to cite this record: http://hdl.handle.net/10072/16821
Griffith University copyright notice
Copyright in individual works within the repository belongs to their authors or publishers. You may make a print or digital copy of a work for your personal non-commercial use. All other rights are reserved, except for fair dealings or other user rights granted by the copyright laws of your country.
Back to top