Near-shore swell estimation from a global wind-wave model: Spectral process, linear, and artificial neural network models
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 49454_1.pdf | 2092Kb | Adobe PDF | View |
| Title | Near-shore swell estimation from a global wind-wave model: Spectral process, linear, and artificial neural network models |
|---|---|
| Author | Browne, Matthew; Castelle, Bruno Olivier; Strauss, Darrell; Tomlinson, Rodger Benson; Blumenstein, Michael Myer; Lane, Chris |
| Journal Name | Coastal Engineering |
| Editor | H F Burcharth |
| Year Published | 2007 |
| Place of publication | Netherlands |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV |
| Abstract | Estimation of swell conditions in coastal regions is important for a variety of public, government, and research applications. Driving a model of the near-shore wave transformation from an offshore global swell model such as NOAAWaveWatch3 is an economical means to arrive at swell size estimates at particular locations of interest. Recently, some work (e.g. Browne et al. [Browne, M., Strauss, D., Castelle, B., Blumenstein, M., Tomlinson, R., 2006. Local swell estimation and prediction from a global wind-wave model. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 3 (4), 462–466.]) has examined an artificial neural network (ANN) based, empirical approach to wave estimation. Here, we provide a comprehensive evaluation of two data driven approaches to estimating waves near-shore (linear and ANN), and also contrast these with a more traditional spectral wave simulation model (SWAN). Performance was assessed on data gathered from a total of 17 near-shore locations, with heterogenous geography and bathymetry, around the continent of Australia over a 7 month period. It was found that the ANNs out-performed SWAN and the non-linear architecture consistently out-performed the linear method. Variability in performance and differential performance with regard to geographical location could largely be explained in terms of the underlying complexity of the local wave transformation. |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Published | Yes |
| Publisher URI | http://www.elsevier.com/locate/coastaleng |
| Alternative URI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2006.11.007 |
| Copyright Statement | Copyright 2007 Elsevier. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version. |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue Number | 5 |
| Page from | 445 |
| Page to | 460 |
| ISSN | 0378-3839 |
| Date Accessioned | 2008-02-29 |
| Date Available | 2009-08-27T06:53:17Z |
| Language | en_AU |
| Research Centre | Griffith Centre for Coastal Management; Institute for Integrated and Intelligent Systems |
| Faculty | Faculty of Science, Environment, Engineering and Technology |
| Subject | PRE2009-Environmental Engineering Modelling |
| URI | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/17987 |
| Publication Type | Journal Articles (Refereed Article) |
| Publication Type Code | c1 |
Please use this identifier to cite this record: http://hdl.handle.net/10072/17987
Griffith University copyright notice
Copyright in individual works within the repository belongs to their authors or publishers. You may make a print or digital copy of a work for your personal non-commercial use. All other rights are reserved, except for fair dealings or other user rights granted by the copyright laws of your country.
Back to top