Indigenous sentencing courts: Towards a theoretical and jurisprudential model
There are no files associated with this record.
| Title | Indigenous sentencing courts: Towards a theoretical and jurisprudential model |
|---|---|
| Author | Marchetti, Elena Maria; Daly, Kathleen |
| Journal Name | Sydney Law Review |
| Editor | Ivan Shearer |
| Year Published | 2007 |
| Place of publication | Rozelle, N.S.W. |
| Publisher | Lawbook Co |
| Abstract | Since 1999, a number of Indigenous sentencing courts have been established in Australia that use Indigenous community representatives to talk to a defendant about their offending and to assist a judicial officer in sentencing. The courts are often portrayed as having emerged to reduce the over-representation of Indigenous people in the criminal justice system and to address key recommendations made by the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody, in particular, those centred on reducing Indigenous incarceration, and on increasing the participation of Indigenous people in the justice system as court staff or advisors. They are also said to reflect partnership practices that were recommended in Justice Agreements made throughout Australia between state governments and Indigenous organisations. In this article, we argue that these courts have broader aims and objectives in that they seek to achieve a cultural and political transformation of the law, which is not as evident in other new justice practices such as restorative justice or therapeutic jurisprudence. There is a great deal of variation in the way the Indigenous sentencing courts have been established in each Australian State and Territory and in the practices they use. Despite the variations we show that the courts have common goals: to make court processes more culturally appropriate and to increase the involvement of Indigenous people (including the offender, support persons and the local community) in the court process. Although advocates of new justice practices associate Indigenous sentencing courts with restorative justice and therapeutic jurisprudence, we argue that while they have some elements in common, Indigenous courts have distinct aims and objectives. By analysing practices, protocols and other empirical materials, we show why Indigenous sentencing courts deserve a unique theoretical and jurisprudential model and why they are better viewed as being in a category of their own. |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Published | Yes |
| Publisher URI | http://www.law.usyd.edu.au/slr/ |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue Number | 3 |
| Page from | 415 |
| Page to | 443 |
| ISSN | 0082-0512 |
| Date Accessioned | 2007-11-19 |
| Date Available | 2008-10-17T07:28:58Z |
| Language | en_AU |
| Research Centre | Key Centre for Ethics, Law, Justice and Governance |
| Faculty | Griffith Law School |
| Subject | Jurisprudence and Legal Theory |
| URI | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/18223 |
| Publication Type | Journal Articles (Refereed Article) |
| Publication Type Code | c1 |
Please use this identifier to cite this record: http://hdl.handle.net/10072/18223
Griffith University copyright notice
Copyright in individual works within the repository belongs to their authors or publishers. You may make a print or digital copy of a work for your personal non-commercial use. All other rights are reserved, except for fair dealings or other user rights granted by the copyright laws of your country.
Back to top