Scopolamine (hyoscine) for preventing and treating motion sickness

File Size Format
47766_1.pdf 306Kb Adobe PDF View
Title Scopolamine (hyoscine) for preventing and treating motion sickness
Author Spinks, Anneliese Barclay; Wasiak, Jason; Villanueva, Elmer; Bernath, Vivienne
Journal Name Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Year Published 2007
Place of publication United Kingdom
Publisher John Wiley & Sons
Abstract BACKGROUND: Motion sickness - the discomfort experienced when perceived motion disturbs the organs of balance - may include symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, pallor, cold sweats, hypersalivation, hyperventilation and headaches. The control and prevention of these symptoms have included pharmacological, behavioral and complementary therapies. Although scopolamine (hyoscine) has been used in the treatment and prevention of motion sickness for decades, there have been no systematic reviews of its effectiveness. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of scopolamine versus no therapy, placebo, other drugs, behavioral and complementary therapy or two or more of the above therapies in combination for motion sickness in persons (both adults and children) without known vestibular, visual or central nervous system pathology. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Group Specialized Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2007), MEDLINE (OVID, 1966 to May 2007), EMBASE (1974 to May 2007) CINAHL (OVID, 1982 to May 2007) and reference lists of retrieved studies were searched for relevant studies. No language restrictions were applied. The date of the last search was May 2007. SELECTION CRITERIA: All parallel-arm, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on scopolamine versus no therapy, placebo, other drugs, behavioral and complementary therapy or two or more of the above therapies in combination were included. Outcomes relating to the prevention of onset or treatment of clinically-defined motion sickness, task ability and psychological tests, changes in physiological parameters and adverse effects were considered. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data from the studies were extracted independently by two authors using standardized forms. Study quality was assessed. Dichotomous data were expressed as odds ratio (OR) and a pooled OR was calculated using the random-effects model. MAIN RESULTS: Of 35 studies considered potentially relevant, 14 studies enrolling 1025 subjects met the entry criteria. Scopolamine was administered via transdermal patches, tablets or capsules, oral solutions or intravenously. Scopolamine was compared against placebo, calcium channel antagonists, antihistamine, methscopolamine or a combination of scopolamine and ephedrine. Studies were generally small in size and of varying quality.Scopolamine was more effective than placebo in the prevention of symptoms. Comparisons between scopolamine and other agents were few and suggested that scopolamine was superior (versus methscopolamine) or equivalent (versus antihistamines) as a preventative agent. Evidence comparing scopolamine to cinnarizine or combinations of scopolamine and ephedrine is equivocal or minimal.Although sample sizes were small, scopolamine was no more likely to induce drowsiness, blurring of vision or dizziness compared to other agents. Dry mouth was more likely with scopolamine than with methscopolamine or cinnarizine.No studies were available relating to the therapeutic effectiveness of scopolamine in the management of established symptoms of motion sickness. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The use of scopolamine versus placebo in preventing motion sickness has been shown to be effective. No conclusions can be made on the comparative effectiveness of scopolamine and other agents such as antihistamines and calcium channel antagonists. In addition, no randomized controlled trials were identified that examined the effectiveness of scopolamine in the treatment of established symptoms of motion sickness.
Peer Reviewed Yes
Published Yes
Alternative URI
Copyright Statement Copyright 2007 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by JohnWiley & Sons, Ltd. This review is published as a Cochrane Review in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD002851. Cochrane Reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to comments and criticisms, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews should be consulted for the most recent version of the Review.
Volume 2007
Issue Number 3
Page from 1
Page to 21
ISSN 1469-493X
Date Accessioned 2008-01-02
Date Available 2015-05-12T02:03:34Z
Language en_US
Faculty Griffith Health Faculty
Subject PRE2009-Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Publication Type Journal Articles (Refereed Article)
Publication Type Code c1

Show simple item record

Griffith University copyright notice