Prospective study of peripheral arterial catheter infection and comparison with concurrently sited central venous catheters.

File Size Format
49721_1.pdf 202Kb Adobe PDF View
Title Prospective study of peripheral arterial catheter infection and comparison with concurrently sited central venous catheters.
Author Koh, David Boon Chai; Gowardman, John R.; Rickard, Claire; Robertson, Iain K.; Brown, Andrew
Journal Name Critical Care Medicine
Year Published 2008
Place of publication USA
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Abstract OBJECTIVE: Peripheral arterial catheters are perceived as having low infective potential compared with other catheters and may be overlooked as a cause of catheter-related bloodstream infection. We aimed to measure colonization and rates of catheter-related bloodstream infection in arterial catheters, to investigate risk factors for arterial catheter colonization, and to compare arterial catheter infection rates with those in concurrently sited and managed central venous catheters. DESIGN: Prospective 24-month cohort study. SETTING: Eight-bed combined general intensive care and high-dependency unit of a 350-bed Australian teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Three hundred twenty-one arterial catheters in 252 adult and pediatric patients were observed for 1,082 catheter days, and 618 central venous catheters in 410 patients were observed for 4,040 catheter days. All catheters were inserted in, or presented to, the intensive care unit. Both arterial catheters and central venous catheters were inserted by trained personnel under aseptic conditions, and management was standardized. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The incidence per 1,000 (95% confidence interval) catheter days of colonization (> or = 15 colonies) and catheter-related bloodstream infection was 15.7 (9.5-25.9) and 0.92 (0.13-6.44) for arterial catheters and 16.8 (13.3-21.3) and 2.23 (1.12-4.44) for central venous catheters. Arterial catheter colonization was not significantly different than that in central venous catheters (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-3.36; p = .77). Arterial catheter colonization increased with dwell time and was similar to central venous catheters over time. Femoral arterial catheters were colonized more often than radial arterial catheters (hazard ratio, 5.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.85, 30.3; p = .075), and colonization was significantly higher when the catheter was inserted in the operating theater or emergency department (hazard ratio, 4.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-13.9; p = .01) compared with the intensive care unit. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection from arterial catheters was low. However, both arterial catheter colonization and rates of catheter-related bloodstream infection were similar to those in concurrently sited and identically managed central venous catheters. By inference, the arterial catheter should be accorded the same degree of importance as the central venous catheter as a potential source of sepsis.
Peer Reviewed Yes
Published Yes
Publisher URI http://www.ccmjournal.org
Alternative URI http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e318161f74b
Copyright Statement Copyright 2008 LWW. This is a non-final version of an article published in final form in Critical Care Medicine, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 397-402]. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal link for access to the definitive, published version.
Volume 36
Issue Number 2
Page from 397
Page to 402
ISSN 0090-3493
Date Accessioned 2008-03-07
Language en_US
Research Centre Griffith Health Institute; Centre for Health Practice Innovation
Faculty Griffith Health Faculty
Subject PRE2009-Clinical Nursing: Secondary (Acute Care); PRE2009-Infectious Diseases; PRE2009-Intensive Care
URI http://hdl.handle.net/10072/21022
Publication Type Journal Articles (Refereed Article)
Publication Type Code c1

Show simple item record

Griffith University copyright notice