Effect of anoxia on the electroretinogram of three anoxia-tolerant vertebrates
There are no files associated with this record.
| Title | Effect of anoxia on the electroretinogram of three anoxia-tolerant vertebrates |
|---|---|
| Author | Stenslokken, Kare-Olav; Milton, Sarah L.; Lutz, Peter L.; Sundin, lena; Renshaw, Gillian Mary Claire; Stecyk, Jonathan A. W.; Nilsson, Goran E. |
| Journal Name | Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology - A Molecular and Integrative Physiology |
| Editor | Patrick J. Walsh (Editor-in-Chief), Thomas P Mommsen (Editor-in-Chief) |
| Year Published | 2008 |
| Place of publication | Amsterdam, The Netherlands, |
| Publisher | Elsvier |
| Abstract | To survive anoxia, neural ATP levels have to be defended. Reducing electrical activity, which accounts for 50% or more of neural energy consumption, should be beneficial for anoxic survival. The retina is a hypoxia sensitive part of the central nervous system. Here, we quantify the in vivo retinal light response (electroretinogram; ERG) in three vertebrates that exhibit varying degrees of anoxia tolerance: freshwater turtle (Trachemys scripta), epaulette shark (Hemiscyllium ocellatum) and leopard frog (Rana pipiens). A virtually total suppression of ERG in anoxia, probably resulting in functional blindness, has previously been seen in the extremely anoxia-tolerant crucian carp (Carassius carassius). Surprisingly, the equally anoxiatolerant turtle, which strongly depresses brain and whole-body metabolism during anoxia, exhibited a relatively modest anoxic reduction in ERG: the combined amplitude of turtle ERG waves was reduced by ~50% after 2 h. In contrast, the shark b-wave amplitude practically disappeared after 30 min of severe hypoxia, and the frog b-wave was decreased by ~75% after 40 min in anoxia. The specific A1 adenosine receptor antagonist CPT significantly delayed the suppression of turtle ERG, while the hypoxic shark ERG was unaffected by the non-specific adenosine receptor antagonist aminophylline, suggesting adenosinergic involvement in turtle but not in shark. |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Published | Yes |
| Publisher URI | http://www.elsevier.com/locate/cbpa |
| Alternative URI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.03.022 |
| Copyright Statement | Copyright 2008 Elsevier. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version. |
| Volume | 152 |
| Page from | 395 |
| Page to | 403 |
| ISSN | 1095-6433 |
| Date Accessioned | 2009-03-13 |
| Date Available | 2009-04-09T22:37:46Z |
| Language | en_AU |
| Research Centre | Heart Foundation Research Centre; Griffith Health Institute |
| Faculty | Griffith Health Faculty |
| Subject | Biological Adaptation |
| URI | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/22112 |
| Publication Type | Journal Articles (Refereed Article) |
| Publication Type Code | c1 |
Please use this identifier to cite this record: http://hdl.handle.net/10072/22112
Griffith University copyright notice
Copyright in individual works within the repository belongs to their authors or publishers. You may make a print or digital copy of a work for your personal non-commercial use. All other rights are reserved, except for fair dealings or other user rights granted by the copyright laws of your country.
Back to top