Relation between changes in posteroanterior stiffness and active range of movement of the cervical spine following manual therapy treatment

File Size Format
51890_1.pdf 474Kb Adobe PDF View
Title Relation between changes in posteroanterior stiffness and active range of movement of the cervical spine following manual therapy treatment
Author Tuttle, Neil Alan; Barrett, Rod; Laakso, Liisa
Journal Name Spine
Editor James N Weinstein (Editor-in-Chief)
Year Published 2008
Place of publication United States
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Abstract STUDY DESIGN: Repeated measures study of active and passive movements in patients with neck pain. OBJECTIVES: To determine if, following manual therapy: (1) changes occur in active range of movement (AROM) and stiffness of posteroanterior (PA) movements, (2) such changes are dependent on the location treated, and (3) there is a relation between changes in PA stiffness and AROM. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PA movements are frequently used to assess patients with neck pain but little is known about how these movements are related to patient symptoms. METHODS: One location deemed symptomatic and hypomobile and 1 asymptomatic location were selected in 20 patients with neck pain for more than 2 weeks. PA stiffness at each location and AROM were measured before and after each of 4 manual therapy interventions: PA movements to each location, a general treatment, and a control intervention. RESULTS: The general intervention had a greater increase in each axis of AROM than the other interventions (F = 2.814 to 7.929, DF = 3) but there were no differences in PA stiffness across interventions (F = 0.945, DF = 3). Differences in PA stiffness was divided into regions by applied force. After treatment to the symptomatic location, regions of stiffness at forces above 8 N demonstrated significant correlations with total AROM (R = -0.466 to -0.628). CONCLUSION: After manual therapy, increased AROM is related to decreased PA stiffness in patients with neck pain, but only for the treated location and only when that location had been identified previously as symptomatic and hypomobile.
Peer Reviewed Yes
Published Yes
Publisher URI http://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/pages/default.aspx
Alternative URI http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817f93f9
Copyright Statement Copyright [year] LWW. This is a non-final version of an article published in final form in Spine Volume 33 - Issue 19, pp E673-E679. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal link for access to the definitive, published version.
Volume 33
Issue Number 19
Page from E673
Page to E679
ISSN 0362-2436
Date Accessioned 2008-09-04
Date Available 2010-11-24T07:25:18Z
Language en_AU
Research Centre Griffith Health Institute; Centre for Musculoskeletal Research
Faculty Griffith Health Faculty
Subject PRE2009-Therapies and Therapeutic Technology
URI http://hdl.handle.net/10072/22457
Publication Type Journal Articles (Refereed Article)
Publication Type Code c1

Show simple item record

Griffith University copyright notice