A multi-centre, randomised clinical control trial comparing the retropubic (RP) approach versus the transobturator approach (TO) for tension-free, suburethral sling treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence: the TORP study
There are no files associated with this record.
| Title | A multi-centre, randomised clinical control trial comparing the retropubic (RP) approach versus the transobturator approach (TO) for tension-free, suburethral sling treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence: the TORP study |
|---|---|
| Author | Barry, Christopher; Lim, Yik Nyok; Muller, Reinhold; Hitchins, Sarah; Corstiaans, Audrey; Foote, Andrew; Greenland, Hugh; Frazer, Malcolm Ian; Rane, Ajay |
| Editor | Dr. Mickey M Karram |
| Year Published | 2008 |
| Publisher | Springer-Verlag UK |
| Citation | International Urogynecology Journal, Vol. 19, pp. 171-178 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Published | Yes |
| Alternative URI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0412-y |
| Faculty | Griffith Health Faculty |
| Publication Type | Journal Articles (Refereed Article) |
Please use this identifier to cite this record: http://hdl.handle.net/10072/22471
Griffith University copyright notice
Copyright in individual works within the repository belongs to their authors or publishers. You may make a print or digital copy of a work for your personal non-commercial use. All other rights are reserved, except for fair dealings or other user rights granted by the copyright laws of your country.
Footer information
Back to top