Intention and diverging interpretings of implicature in the "uncovered meat" sermon

File Size Format
50318_1.pdf 160Kb Adobe PDF View
Title Intention and diverging interpretings of implicature in the "uncovered meat" sermon
Author Haugh, Michael Bevan
Journal Name Intercultural Pragmatics
Editor Istvan Kecskes
Year Published 2008
Place of publication Berlin
Publisher Mouton de Gruyter
Abstract The standard model of communication in linguistic pragmatics is founded on the assumption that “successful” communication involves the addressee making inferences about the intentions of the speaker. Miscommunication of implicatures thus presumably arises when the addressee does not correctly infer the speaker's intention. In this paper, however, it is argued that this view of the (mis)communication of implicatures does not adequately account for the manner in which intentions may become the subject of discursive dispute in interaction thereby giving rise to diverging interpretings of implicatures. Drawing from an analysis of the “uncovered meat” comments made by Sheik Taj Din al-Hilali and the ensuing controversy over what was implied by them, it is argued that to label such an incident as simply a misunderstanding of the speaker's intentions is misleading. Instead, it is suggested that the way in which Hilali's comments were shifted from a specific audience in the Muslim community to wider Australian society by the media engendered discursive dispute over Hilali's intentions, and thus gave rise to the co-constitution of diverging interpretings of what was implied by Hilali. Building a model of the communication of implicatures must therefore move beyond the received view that it involves “correctly” inferring the intentions of speakers to encompass a broader view where both converging and diverging interpretings of implicatures emerge through their conjoint co-constitution in interaction.
Peer Reviewed Yes
Published Yes
Publisher URI
Alternative URI
Copyright Statement Copyright 2008 Walter de Gruyter & Co. KG Publishers. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the publisher's website for access to the definitive, published version.
Volume 5
Issue Number 2
Page from 201
Page to 228
ISSN 1612-295X
Date Accessioned 2009-01-06
Language en_AU
Research Centre Griffith Centre for Cultural Research; Griffith Institute for Educational Research
Faculty Faculty of Arts
Subject PRE2009-Discourse and Pragmatics
Publication Type Journal Articles (Refereed Article)
Publication Type Code c1

Show simple item record

Griffith University copyright notice