Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTilbury, Clare
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T15:00:49Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T15:00:49Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.date.modified2009-10-09T06:12:17Z
dc.identifier.issn10350772
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1035077200005654
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/24400
dc.description.abstractThis article examines data regarding three performance indicators that cast light on child protection intake and assessment processes, when children are reported to child protection agencies because of concerns about abuse or neglect. Rates of renotification, substantiation, and resubstantiation are examined What do the data reveal about whether intervention is effective in keeping children safe from further harm and whether investigative resources are targeted 10 priority cases? The policy implications are discussed
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.description.publicationstatusYes
dc.format.extent799838 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherOz Child
dc.publisher.placeMelbourne
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom4
dc.relation.ispartofpageto10
dc.relation.ispartofissue3
dc.relation.ispartofjournalChildren Australia
dc.relation.ispartofvolume28
dc.subject.fieldofresearchSocial Work
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1607
dc.titleRepeated reports to child protection: interpreting the data
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.rights.copyright© 2003 Children Australia. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version.
gro.date.issued2003
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorTilbury, Clare


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record