Backseat driver? the Commonwealth, Regional Forest Agreements and Australian Federalism

There are no files associated with this record.

Title Backseat driver? the Commonwealth, Regional Forest Agreements and Australian Federalism
Author Hollander, Robyn
Publication Title Australasian Political Studies Association Conference 2005
Editor Political Studies Dept, University of Otago
Year Published 2005
Place of publication Published Online
Publisher Australasian Political Studies Association
Abstract In recent times, the commonwealth has shown a keen interest in moving into areas of state responsibility. Most recent proposals involve either a direct assumption of state powers as is the case in industrial relations, or direct negotiations with the agencies or community organisations as in the case of university reform or funding for environmental projects. However, in the less partisan climate of the mid 1990s, the commonwealth was content to exercise more indirect levers, working through the states to reshape policy outcomes, while leaving formal responsibilities intact. This indirect approach, most evident in National Competition Policy, shielded the commonwealth from the messy political consequences of pursuing unpopular policy agendas, leaving the states to carry the bulk of the political opprobrium. Throughout much of the late 1980s and early 1990s, commonwealth-state relations around forest management were politically charged. The Regional Forest Agreement (RFA) process was a mechanism which reduced the political heat on the commonwealth whilst still allowing it to retain a degree of influence in state government resource management. This paper examines the RFA process from a federalist perspective. It asks has the RFA process allowed the commonwealth to remove itself from a difficult political situation , or instead has it provided the commonwealth with a sophisticated tool which allows it considerable influence with only minimal exposure to political flak? In the case of NCP, three factors were important in establishing the commonwealth’s power – a national policy framework, a negotiated agreement and the strategic use of financial and other power resources. The paper finds that these elements are present to a lesser or greater extent in the RFAs suggesting that the commonwealth retains an important backseat role in forest issues.
Peer Reviewed Yes
Published Yes
Publisher URI
Conference name Australasian Political Studies Association Conference 2005
Location Otaga University, Dunedin, New Zealand
Date From 2005-09-28
Date To 2005-09-30
Date Accessioned 2006-02-27
Date Available 2015-06-04T03:45:05Z
Language en_US
Research Centre Centre for Governance and Public Policy
Faculty Griffith Business School
Subject PRE2009-Public Policy
Publication Type Conference Publications (Full Written Paper - Refereed)
Publication Type Code e1

Show simple item record

Griffith University copyright notice