Conceptualizing otherness: An exploration of the cosmopolitan schema
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61069_1.pdf | 91Kb | Adobe PDF | View |
| Title | Conceptualizing otherness: An exploration of the cosmopolitan schema |
|---|---|
| Author | Calcutt, Lynette Anne; Woodward, Ian Stuart; Skrbis, Zlatko |
| Journal Name | Journal of Sociology |
| Year Published | 2009 |
| Place of publication | United Kingdom |
| Publisher | Sage |
| Abstract | The Australian cosmopolitan is an important symbolic figure in popular discourse and the political landscape. Regardless of the actual scope and scale of 'cosmopolitanness' in Australia, the spectre of cosmopolitanism, and its close relatives such as tolerance of diversity or openness to difference, is a powerful figure in contemporary culture. The cosmopolitan willingness to accommodate otherness is perceived as a betrayal of Australian culture, yet continuing high levels of immigration from diverse sources demand cosmopolitan tolerance. Sociologists know that cosmopolitan people can accommodate diversity, but how this is achieved is the subject of much theoretical debate. It is reasonable to assume that cosmopolitans conceptualize otherness in ways that reduce or eliminate a sense of threat, but how can we reliably access individual conceptualizations? Informed by a cultural sociology approach, this project utilized the concept of cognitive schemas from psychology, and formal semantics from linguistics, to access cosmopolitan conceptualizations. Analysis of focus group data concluded that cosmopolitan schemas are constructed using a repertoire of strategies which compartmentalize categories of otherness into manageable portions. It is argued that, from the cosmopolitan perspective, Australian cultural integrity remains the intact and dominant host of smaller, harmless or manageable cultural fragments. |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Published | Yes |
| Alternative URI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1440783309103344 |
| Copyright Statement | Copyright 2009 The Australian Sociological Association. This is the author-manuscript version of the paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version. |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue Number | 2 |
| Page from | 169 |
| Page to | 186 |
| ISSN | 1440-7833 |
| Date Accessioned | 2010-02-23 |
| Date Available | 2010-06-09T07:35:04Z |
| Language | en_AU |
| Research Centre | Griffith Centre for Cultural Research |
| Faculty | Faculty of Humanities and Social Science |
| Subject | Social Theory |
| URI | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/30000 |
| Publication Type | Journal Articles (Refereed Article) |
| Publication Type Code | c1 |
Please use this identifier to cite this record: http://hdl.handle.net/10072/30000
Griffith University copyright notice
Copyright in individual works within the repository belongs to their authors or publishers. You may make a print or digital copy of a work for your personal non-commercial use. All other rights are reserved, except for fair dealings or other user rights granted by the copyright laws of your country.
Back to top