Registered nurses' and midwives' knowledge of epidural analgesia

File Size Format
59481_1.pdf 102Kb Adobe PDF View
Title Registered nurses' and midwives' knowledge of epidural analgesia
Author Bird, Annette; Wallis, Marianne; Chaboyer, Wendy
Journal Name Collegian
Year Published 2009
Place of publication Netherlands
Publisher Elsevier
Abstract Background: Despite epidural analgesia increasingly being utilized in hospitals, very little research-based evidence is available about registered nurses' (RNs) and midwives' knowledge of this technique. Objective: To describe the current epidural knowledge levels of RNs and midwives in a multi-site setting. Method: RNs and midwives at four, regional teaching facilities completed an epidural knowledge test. The instrument included demographic items and five knowledge subscales relating to epidural analgesia: spinal cord anatomy and physiology; epidural pharmacology; complications of epidural analgesia; assessment of sensory and motor blockade and the general management of patients with epidural analgesia. Results: A total of 408 (99.7% response) RNs and midwives completed the test. Respondents demonstrated good knowledge of sensory and motor blockade assessment and the general management of epidural analgesia subscales with correct responses to 75 and 77% of the questions in these subscales, respectively. Fair knowledge relating to the spinal cord anatomy and physiology subscale was demonstrated with 69% of the questions answered correctly. The knowledge subscales relating to epidural pharmacology (57% correct responses) and the complications of epidural analgesia (56% correct responses) were problematic for the sample. Conclusion: The research results provide generalizable information about what RNs and midwives know about epidural analgesia. These results are an important guide in the development of new and existing dedicated epidural education programs. The results also provide some direction for further research into this important topic.
Peer Reviewed Yes
Published Yes
Alternative URI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2009.03.004
Copyright Statement Copyright 2009 Royal College of Nursing, Australia. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal website for access to the definitive, published version.
Volume 16
Issue Number 4
Page from 193
Page to 200
ISSN 1322-7696
Date Accessioned 2010-01-27
Date Available 2010-06-07T08:16:02Z
Language en_AU
Research Centre Griffith Health Institute; Centre for Health Practice Innovation
Faculty Griffith Health Faculty
Subject Clinical Nursing: Secondary (Acute Care)
URI http://hdl.handle.net/10072/30441
Publication Type Journal Articles (Refereed Article)
Publication Type Code c1

Show simple item record

Griffith University copyright notice