Registered nurses' and midwives' knowledge of epidural analgesia
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 59481_1.pdf | 102Kb | Adobe PDF | View |
| Title | Registered nurses' and midwives' knowledge of epidural analgesia |
|---|---|
| Author | Bird, Annette; Wallis, Marianne; Chaboyer, Wendy |
| Journal Name | Collegian |
| Year Published | 2009 |
| Place of publication | Netherlands |
| Publisher | Elsevier |
| Abstract | Background: Despite epidural analgesia increasingly being utilized in hospitals, very little research-based evidence is available about registered nurses' (RNs) and midwives' knowledge of this technique. Objective: To describe the current epidural knowledge levels of RNs and midwives in a multi-site setting. Method: RNs and midwives at four, regional teaching facilities completed an epidural knowledge test. The instrument included demographic items and five knowledge subscales relating to epidural analgesia: spinal cord anatomy and physiology; epidural pharmacology; complications of epidural analgesia; assessment of sensory and motor blockade and the general management of patients with epidural analgesia. Results: A total of 408 (99.7% response) RNs and midwives completed the test. Respondents demonstrated good knowledge of sensory and motor blockade assessment and the general management of epidural analgesia subscales with correct responses to 75 and 77% of the questions in these subscales, respectively. Fair knowledge relating to the spinal cord anatomy and physiology subscale was demonstrated with 69% of the questions answered correctly. The knowledge subscales relating to epidural pharmacology (57% correct responses) and the complications of epidural analgesia (56% correct responses) were problematic for the sample. Conclusion: The research results provide generalizable information about what RNs and midwives know about epidural analgesia. These results are an important guide in the development of new and existing dedicated epidural education programs. The results also provide some direction for further research into this important topic. |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Published | Yes |
| Alternative URI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2009.03.004 |
| Copyright Statement | Copyright 2009 Royal College of Nursing, Australia. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal website for access to the definitive, published version. |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue Number | 4 |
| Page from | 193 |
| Page to | 200 |
| ISSN | 1322-7696 |
| Date Accessioned | 2010-01-27 |
| Date Available | 2010-06-07T08:16:02Z |
| Language | en_AU |
| Research Centre | Griffith Health Institute; Centre for Health Practice Innovation |
| Faculty | Griffith Health Faculty |
| Subject | Clinical Nursing: Secondary (Acute Care) |
| URI | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/30441 |
| Publication Type | Journal Articles (Refereed Article) |
| Publication Type Code | c1 |
Please use this identifier to cite this record: http://hdl.handle.net/10072/30441
Griffith University copyright notice
Copyright in individual works within the repository belongs to their authors or publishers. You may make a print or digital copy of a work for your personal non-commercial use. All other rights are reserved, except for fair dealings or other user rights granted by the copyright laws of your country.
Back to top