dc.contributor.author | Naito, Mikako | |
dc.contributor.author | O'Callaghan, Frances V | |
dc.contributor.author | Morrissey, Shirley | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-03T12:25:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-05-03T12:25:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.modified | 2010-10-28T07:12:49Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0363-0242 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/03630240902915119 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/30521 | |
dc.description.abstract | The present study compared the utility of two models (the Theory of Planned Behavior and Protection Motivation Theory) in identifying factors associated with intentions to undertake screening mammography, before and after an intervention. The comparison was made between the unique components of the two models. The effect of including implementation intentions was also investigated. Two hundred and fifty-one women aged 37 to 69 years completed questionnaires at baseline and following the delivery of a standard (control) or a protection motivation theory-based informational intervention. Hierarchical multiple regressions indicated that theory of planned behavior variables were associated with mammography intentions. Results also showed that inclusion of implementation intention in the model significantly increased the association with mammography intentions. The findings suggest that future interventions aiming to increase screening mammography participation should focus on the theory of planned behavior variables and that implementation intention should also be targeted. | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Yes | |
dc.description.publicationstatus | Yes | |
dc.format.extent | 116827 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Routledge | |
dc.publisher.place | United States | |
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublication | Y | |
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom | 101 | |
dc.relation.ispartofpageto | 118 | |
dc.relation.ispartofissue | 2 | |
dc.relation.ispartofjournal | Women & Health | |
dc.relation.ispartofvolume | 49 | |
dc.rights.retention | Y | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearch | Other human society | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode | 4499 | |
dc.title | Understanding Women’s Mammography Intentions: A Theory-Based Investigation | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
dc.type.description | C1 - Articles | |
dc.type.code | C - Journal Articles | |
gro.faculty | An Unassigned Group, An Unassigned Department | |
gro.rights.copyright | © 2009 Routledge. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal website for access to the definitive, published version. | |
gro.date.issued | 2009 | |
gro.hasfulltext | Full Text | |
gro.griffith.author | O'Callaghan, Frances V. | |
gro.griffith.author | Naito, Mikako | |
gro.griffith.author | Morrissey, Shirley A. | |