Making Information Systems Less Scrugged: Reflecting on the processes of change in teaching and learning
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62538_1.pdf | 288Kb | Adobe PDF | View |
| Title | Making Information Systems Less Scrugged: Reflecting on the processes of change in teaching and learning |
|---|---|
| Author | Houghton, Luke; Ruth, Alison |
| Journal Name | Journal of Information Technology Education |
| Editor | Keith Willoughby and Eli Cohen |
| Year Published | 2010 |
| Place of publication | United States |
| Publisher | Informing Science Institute |
| Abstract | Deep and shallow learner approaches are useful for different purposes. Shallow learning can be good where fact memorization is appropriate, learning how to swim or play the guitar for exam- ple. Deep learning is much more appropriate when the learning material present involves going beyond simple facts and into what lies below the surface. When students are asked to think about how facts are created and what they mean, then deep learning is needed. Deep learning requires students to think about the conceptual material used to construct a theory and to reflect on its meaning until they understand and can reconceptualise the item under study. Some forms of learning are more conducive to approaches that do not need deep reflection, although this process invariably brings greater learning potential. This paper outlines a course that was considered by the authors to be 'scrugged'. The word scrugged is defined as 'rough' as in “it's been a scrugged day.” This word arose in a teaching and learning environment in South Australia and was shared on a social networking site. Use of this term seems appropriate in a discipline based on continual change. The rough 'scrugged' approach of the standard information systems fare presents a real problem for Information Systems (IS) Academics because it gives IS the 'shallow' treatment. It is at best a loosely joined mix of concepts coming from multiple directions which does not present a useful framework for theory and instead presents a very thinly constructed grouping of concepts that are superficially treated. The shallow conceptual structure leaves no room for reflective thinking, learning or critical thinking. What results is a good understanding of what kinds of in- formation systems exist, but a very shallow understanding of disciplinary themes and meaning beyond simple artefacts. In this paper, we outline an approach to a course which moved students from shallow repetitive tasks to deep reflective learning around the concepts of Information Sys- tems and discuss the long term implications for Information Systems teaching. |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Published | Yes |
| Publisher URI | http://jite.org/index.html |
| Copyright Statement | Copyright 2010 Houghton et al; licensee Informing Science Institute. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/), which permits sharing and adapting, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Volume | 9 |
| Page from | IIP-91 |
| Page to | IIP-102 |
| ISSN | 1539-3585 |
| Date Accessioned | 2010-05-07 |
| Date Available | 2010-07-16T06:09:03Z |
| Language | en_AU |
| Research Centre | Institute for Integrated and Intelligent Systems |
| Faculty | Griffith Business School |
| Subject | Economics, Business and Management Curriculum and Pedagogy |
| URI | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/32299 |
| Publication Type | Journal Articles (Refereed Article) |
| Publication Type Code | c1 |
Please use this identifier to cite this record: http://hdl.handle.net/10072/32299
Griffith University copyright notice
Copyright in individual works within the repository belongs to their authors or publishers. You may make a print or digital copy of a work for your personal non-commercial use. All other rights are reserved, except for fair dealings or other user rights granted by the copyright laws of your country.
Back to top