Integration of science and monitoring of river ecosystem health to guide investments in catchment protection and rehabilitation

File Size Format
63381_1.pdf 203Kb Adobe PDF View
Title Integration of science and monitoring of river ecosystem health to guide investments in catchment protection and rehabilitation
Author Bunn, Stuart; Abal, E. G.; Smith, M. J.; Choy, S. C.; Fellows, Christy Susan; Harch, B. D.; Kennard, Mark James; Sheldon, Fran
Journal Name Freshwater Biology
Year Published 2010
Place of publication United Kingdom
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell Publishing
Abstract 1. Stream ecosystem health monitoring and reporting need to be developed in the context of an adaptive process that is clearly linked to identified values and objectives, is informed by rigorous science, guides management actions and is responsive to changing perceptions and values of stakeholders. To be effective, monitoring programmes also need to be underpinned by an understanding of the probable causal factors that influence the condition or health of important environmental assets and values. This is often difficult in stream and river ecosystems where multiple stressors, acting at different spatial and temporal scales, interact to affect water quality, biodiversity and ecosystem processes. 2. In this article, we describe the development of a freshwater monitoring programme in South East Queensland, Australia, and how this has been used to report on ecosystem health at a regional scale and to guide investments in catchment protection and rehabilitation. We also discuss some of the emerging science needs to identify the appropriate scale and spatial arrangement of rehabilitation to maximise river ecosystem health outcomes and, at the same time, derive other benefits downstream. 3. An objective process was used to identify potential indicators of stream ecosystem health and then test these across a known catchment land-use disturbance gradient. From the 75 indicators initially tested, 22 from five indicator groups (water quality, ecosystem metabolism, nutrient cycling, invertebrates and fish) responded strongly to the disturbance gradient, and 16 were subsequently recommended for inclusion in the monitoring programme. The freshwater monitoring programme was implemented in 2002, funded by local and State government authorities, and currently involves the assessment of over 120 sites, twice per year. This information, together with data from a similar programme on the region's estuarine and coastal marine waters, forms the basis of an annual report card that is presented in a public ceremony to local politicians and the broader community. 4. Several key lessons from the SEQ Healthy Waterways Programme are likely to be transferable to other regional programmes aimed at improving aquatic ecosystem health, including the importance of a shared common vision, the involvement of committed individuals, a cooperative approach, the need for defensible science and effective communication.
Peer Reviewed Yes
Published Yes
Alternative URI http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02375.x
Copyright Statement Copyright 2010 Blackwell Publishing. This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: Integration of science and monitoring of river ecosystem health to guide investments in catchment protection and rehabilitation, Freshwater Biology Volume 55, Issue 1, 2010, 223-240, which has been published in final form at 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02375.x.
Volume 55
Issue Number Suppl. 1
Page from 223
Page to 240
ISSN 1365-2427
Date Accessioned 2010-06-24
Date Available 2010-09-09T22:33:10Z
Language en_AU
Research Centre Australian Rivers Institute
Faculty Faculty of Science, Environment, Engineering and Technology
Subject Ecosystem Function; Environmental Management; Environmental Monitoring
URI http://hdl.handle.net/10072/33237
Publication Type Journal Articles (Refereed Article)
Publication Type Code c1

Brief Record

Griffith University copyright notice