From Deep North to International Governance Exemplar: Fitzgerald's Impact on the International Anti-Corruption Movement

File Size Format
63866_1.pdf 265Kb Adobe PDF View
Title From Deep North to International Governance Exemplar: Fitzgerald's Impact on the International Anti-Corruption Movement
Author Sampford, Charles John
Journal Name Griffith Law Review
Year Published 2009
Place of publication Australia
Publisher Grifftith University Law School
Abstract In pre-Fitzgerald Queensland, the existence of corruption was widely known but its extent and modes of operation were not fully evident. The Fitzgerald Report identified the need for reform of the structure, procedures and efficiency in public administration in Queensland. What was most striking in the Queensland reform process was that a new model for combatting corruption had been developed. Rather than rely upon a single law and a single institution, existing institutions were strengthened and new institutions were introduced to create a set of mutually supporting and mutually checking institutions, agencies and laws that jointly sought to improve governmental standards and combat corruption. Some of the reforms were either unique to Queensland or very rare. One of the strengths of this approach was that it avoided creating a single over-arching institution to fight corruption. There are many powerful opponents of reform. Influential institutions and individuals resist any interference with their privileges. In order to cause a mass exodus from an entrenched corruption system, a seminal event or defining process is needed to alter expectations and incentives that are sufficient to encourage significant numbers of individuals to desert the corruption system and assist the integrity system in exposing and destroying it. The Fitzgerald Inquiry was such an event. This article also briefly addresses methods for destroying national corruption systems where they emerge and exist.
Peer Reviewed Yes
Published Yes
Publisher URI
Copyright Statement Copyright 2009 Griffith Law School. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version.
Volume 18
Issue Number 3
Page from 559
Page to 576
ISSN 1038-3441
Date Accessioned 2010-07-14
Language en_AU
Research Centre Key Centre for Ethics, Law, Justice and Governance
Faculty Faculty of Humanities and Social Science
Subject Public Policy
Publication Type Journal Articles (Refereed Article)
Publication Type Code c1a

Show simple item record

Griffith University copyright notice