Establishing additionality: fraud vulnerabilities in the clean development mechanism
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 65775_1.pdf | 88Kb | Adobe PDF | View |
| Title | Establishing additionality: fraud vulnerabilities in the clean development mechanism |
|---|---|
| Author | Drew, Jacqueline Mary; Drew, Michael Emmanuel |
| Journal Name | Accounting Research Journal |
| Year Published | 2010 |
| Place of publication | United Kingdom |
| Publisher | Emerald |
| Abstract | Purpose: This study explores the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) which creates carbon credits from emission abatement projects in developing economies. The purpose of this paper is to examine the operation of the CDM with specific reference to fraud vulnerabilities regarding the additionality of a project. An examination of the process of establishment, certification and verification of additionality (confirmation that emissions post-implementation of the CDM project are lower than those that would have occurred under the most plausible alternative scenario) is used to highlight the need for particular vigilance in respect to sustaining and improving the integrity of future market-based mechanisms post-Kyoto. Design/methodology/approach: The study takes a case study approach, examining the CDM project cycle and associated key entities. Findings: The study posits that the processes associated with establishing and verifying additionality of a project are potentially key areas of systemic weakness that must be addressed. This case study explores the design features of the CDM that may afford greater opportunities for fraudulent or deceptive practices. Originality/value: The CDM takes a project-by-project approach to establishment, verification and certification of additionality. Whilst conceptually this design may be appropriate from an operational perspective, it potentially provides opportunities for fraudulent outcomes. The individualised approach is, by its very nature, highly resource-intensive and inherently difficult to verify. |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Published | Yes |
| Alternative URI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10309611011092574 |
| Copyright Statement | Copyright 2010 Emerald. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version. |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue Number | 3 |
| Page from | 243 |
| Page to | 253 |
| ISSN | 1030-9616 |
| Date Accessioned | 2010-11-24 |
| Date Available | 2011-04-29T02:58:24Z |
| Language | en_AU |
| Research Centre | ARC Centre of Excellence in Policing and Security |
| Faculty | Arts, Education and Law |
| Subject | Criminology; Finance |
| URI | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/35404 |
| Publication Type | Journal Articles (Refereed Article) |
| Publication Type Code | c1 |
Please use this identifier to cite this record: http://hdl.handle.net/10072/35404
Griffith University copyright notice
Copyright in individual works within the repository belongs to their authors or publishers. You may make a print or digital copy of a work for your personal non-commercial use. All other rights are reserved, except for fair dealings or other user rights granted by the copyright laws of your country.
Back to top