Complaints against police: The complainants' experience
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62844_1.pdf | 461Kb | Adobe PDF | View |
| Title | Complaints against police: The complainants' experience |
|---|---|
| Author | Prenzler, Timothy James; Allard, Troy John; Curry, Steven; Macintyre, Stuart |
| Journal Name | The Journal of Criminal Justice Research |
| Editor | Anthony L. Sciarabba |
| Year Published | 2010 |
| Place of publication | United States |
| Publisher | The Institute for Criminal Justice Research & Consulting |
| Abstract | This paper reports on a survey of citizens who made complaints against Victoria Police officers. The survey revealed considerable dissatisfaction with the complaints and discipline system. Two-thirds believed complaints took too long to resolve and were dissatisfied with how informed they were kept. Over half were dissatisfied with how the investigation was handled, as well as the outcome. Two-thirds had less confidence in the system following their experience with it. While one-third found it difficult to complain, two-thirds found lodging a complaint easy. Two-fifths indicated they experienced attempts to dissuade or obstruct them from lodging their complaint. Complainants' motives did not on the whole appear to be vindictive. They complained because they wanted to be heard, have their feelings validated or because they wanted an explanation or apology, rather than because they were seeking punishment or compensation. Two-thirds of complaints were investigated by police, although two-thirds of respondents indicated they would have preferred to have their complaint investigated by an independent agency. The majority of complainants who were kept informed during the complaint process were satisfied with the investigation or outcome. Respondents' recommendations about how the complaint system could be improved emphasised the desire for independent investigations, along with taking complaints more seriously, improving the time taken to finalise the matter and improving communication. The paper also reports on an initiative in the resolution of matters since the survey was conducted. |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Published | Yes |
| Publisher URI | http://www.icjrc.org/yahoo_site_admin/assets/docs/RM291016_PROOF.44130517.pdf |
| Copyright Statement | Copyright 2010 The Journal of Criminal Justice Research. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version. |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue Number | 1 |
| Page from | 1 |
| Page to | 18 |
| ISSN | 2160-2816 |
| Date Accessioned | 2011-02-08 |
| Date Available | 2011-05-09T06:49:06Z |
| Language | en_AU |
| Research Centre | ARC Centre of Excellence in Policing and Security; Key Centre for Ethics, Law, Justice and Governance |
| Faculty | Arts, Education and Law |
| Subject | Police Administration, Procedures and Practice |
| URI | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/37461 |
| Publication Type | Journal Articles (Refereed Article) |
| Publication Type Code | c1 |
Please use this identifier to cite this record: http://hdl.handle.net/10072/37461
Griffith University copyright notice
Copyright in individual works within the repository belongs to their authors or publishers. You may make a print or digital copy of a work for your personal non-commercial use. All other rights are reserved, except for fair dealings or other user rights granted by the copyright laws of your country.
Back to top