Emission of greenhouse gases from home aerobic composting, anaerobic digestion and vermicomposting of household wastes in Brisbane (Australia)

File Size Format
67714_1.pdf 370Kb Adobe PDF View
Title Emission of greenhouse gases from home aerobic composting, anaerobic digestion and vermicomposting of household wastes in Brisbane (Australia)
Author Chan, Andrew Yiu-chung; Sinha, Rajiv Kumar; Wang, Weijin
Journal Name Waste Management Research
Year Published 2011
Place of publication United kingdom
Publisher Sage
Abstract This study investigated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from three different home waste treatment methods in Brisbane, Australia. Gas samples were taken monthly from 34 backyard composting bins from January to April 2009. Averaged over the study period, the aerobic composting bins released lower amounts of CH4 (2.2 mg m-2 h-1) than the anaerobic digestion bins (9.5 mg m-2 h-1) and the vermicomposting bins (4.8 mg m-2 h-1). The vermicomposting bins had lower N2O emission rates (1.2 mg m-2 h-1) than the others (1.5–1.6 mg m-2 h-1). Total GHG emissions including both N2O and CH4 were 463, 504 and 694 mg CO2-e m-2 h-1 for vermicomposting, aerobic composting and anaerobic digestion, respectively, with N2O contributing >80% in the total budget. The GHG emissions varied substantially with time and were regulated by temperature, moisture content and the waste properties, indicating the potential to mitigate GHG emission through proper management of the composting systems. In comparison with other mainstream municipal waste management options including centralized composting and anaerobic digestion facilities, landfilling and incineration, home composting has the potential to reduce GHG emissions through both lower on-site emissions and the minimal need for transportation and processing. On account of the lower cost, the present results suggest that home composting provides an effective and feasible supplementary waste management method to a centralized facility in particular for cities with lower population density such as the Australian cities.
Peer Reviewed Yes
Published Yes
Alternative URI http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0734242X10375587
Copyright Statement Copyright 2010 The Authors. This is the author-manuscript version of the paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version.
Volume 29
Issue Number 5
Page from 540
Page to 548
ISSN 0734-242X
Date Accessioned 2011-01-31
Language en_US
Faculty Faculty of Science, Environment, Engineering and Technology
Subject Environmental Monitoring
URI http://hdl.handle.net/10072/37594
Publication Type Journal Articles (Refereed Article)
Publication Type Code c1

Show simple item record

Griffith University copyright notice