Investigating mobility patterns for repetitive sexual contact in adult child sex offending
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 66724_1.pdf | 153Kb | Adobe PDF | View |
| Title | Investigating mobility patterns for repetitive sexual contact in adult child sex offending |
|---|---|
| Author | Leclerc, Benoit; Wortley, Richard Keith; Smallbone, Stephen Walkley |
| Journal Name | Journal of Criminal Justice |
| Year Published | 2010 |
| Place of publication | United Kingdom |
| Publisher | Elsevier |
| Abstract | In the present study, geographic mobility exhibited by child sex offenders was examined. Geographic mobility was defined as the use of multiple locations to obtain repetitive sexual contact with the same victim. The sample consisted of 77 adult offenders convicted for having committed a sexual offence against a child, and who agreed to provide confidential self-report data concerning their offending behaviours. Based on a set of offence characteristics, offenders who used a single location were compared to offenders who used multiple locations for sexual contact. Results showed that offenders who used multiple locations are more likely to isolate the victim, use violence, involve the victim in several sexual episodes, abuse the victim for a period exceeding one year, and make the victim participate and perform sexual behaviours on them during sexual episodes. Examining more closely offenders who used multiple locations for abuse, three offence patterns were further identified (i.e., familial-low mobility offence, non familial-high mobility offence, and familial-high mobility offence). Going for a car ride was also found to be a common location/situation used in the familial-low mobility offence subgroup, while the use of outdoor locations on a regular basis was found to be rare in high mobility patterns subgroups. |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Published | Yes |
| Alternative URI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.04.038 |
| Copyright Statement | Copyright 2010 Elsevier. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version. |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue Number | 4 |
| Page from | 648 |
| Page to | 656 |
| ISSN | 0047-2352 |
| Date Accessioned | 2011-01-17 |
| Date Available | 2011-07-01T06:57:33Z |
| Language | en_AU |
| Research Centre | Key Centre for Ethics, Law, Justice and Governance |
| Faculty | Arts, Education and Law |
| Subject | Criminology |
| URI | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/38914 |
| Publication Type | Journal Articles (Refereed Article) |
| Publication Type Code | c1 |
Please use this identifier to cite this record: http://hdl.handle.net/10072/38914
Griffith University copyright notice
Copyright in individual works within the repository belongs to their authors or publishers. You may make a print or digital copy of a work for your personal non-commercial use. All other rights are reserved, except for fair dealings or other user rights granted by the copyright laws of your country.
Back to top