The Citizen's Charter: How such initiatives might be more effective

There are no files associated with this record.

Title The Citizen's Charter: How such initiatives might be more effective
Author James, Simon; Murphy, Kristina; Reinhart, Monika
Journal Name Public Policy and Administration
Year Published 2005
Place of publication United Kingdom
Publisher Sage Publications Ltd.
Abstract In Public Policy and Administration Taylor (1999) concluded that the charter system was inadequate to safeguard consumers' and citizens' interests and that they would have to have a greater input to ensure success. Following its introduction in 1991, the Charter initiative certainly made an impact and by 1997 there were 40 main charters and perhaps 10,000 local ones. However since then the original Citizen's Charter has, in the words of one commentator, 'perished, or at least atrophied' Drewry (2002, p.12). There is little doubt that it could have been more effective. For example, tax charters seem to have had more success - indeed the UK Taxpayers' Charter pre-dates the Citizen's Charter, having been introduced in 1986. This paper therefore reviews the Charter initiative in the light of the development of tax charters and describes a particularly successful one - the Australian Taxpayers' Charter - that continues to provide a clear focus on twelve basic principles of tax administration. An important factor in the Australian success appears to be the more strategic approach taken with respect to the implementation, monitoring and development of its Taxpayers' Charter. The paper also presents relevant results of two surveys (N = 2,040 and 2,374) on the extent to which Australian voters consider the Australian Tax Office adheres to the principles outlined in the Charter. The evidence is consistent with Taylor's (1999) views and concludes that initiatives such as the Citizen's Charter would benefit from more strategic or systematic preparation that incorporates the views and expertise of a wide range of stakeholders before being introduced and for the initiative to become an integral part of the approach to standards of service thereafter.
Peer Reviewed Yes
Published Yes
Alternative URI http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/095207670502000201
Volume 20
Issue Number 2
Page from 1
Page to 18
ISSN 0952-0767
Date Accessioned 2011-03-30
Date Available 2011-06-29T08:09:44Z
Language en_AU
Research Centre Key Centre for Ethics, Law, Justice and Governance; ARC Centre of Excellence in Policing and Security
Faculty Arts, Education and Law
Subject Criminology; Law and Society; Public Economics- Taxation and Revenue
URI http://hdl.handle.net/10072/39293
Publication Type Journal Articles (Refereed Article)
Publication Type Code c1x

Brief Record

Griffith University copyright notice