The Responsibility to Protect and the problem of military intervention

There are no files associated with this record.

Title The Responsibility to Protect and the problem of military intervention
Author Bellamy, Alex J.
Journal Name International Affairs
Year Published 2008
Place of publication United Kingdom
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Abstract The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) has come a long way in a relatively short space of time. From inauspicious beginnings, the principle was endorsed by the General Assembly in 2005 and unanimously reaffirmed by the Security Council in 2006 (Resolution 1674). However, the principle remains hotly contested primarily because of its association with humanitarian intervention and the pervasive belief that its principal aim is to create a pathway for the legitimization of unilateral military intervention. This article sets forth the argument that a deepening consensus on R2P is dependent on its dissociation from the politics of humanitarian intervention and suggests that one way of doing this is by abandoning the search for criteria for decision-making about the use of force, one of the centre pieces of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty 2001 report that coined the phrase R2P. Criteria were never likely to win international support, the article maintains, and were less likely to improve decision-making on how best to respond to major humanitarian crises. Nevertheless, R2P can make an important contribution to thinking about the problem of military intervention by mitigating potential 'moral hazards', overcoming the tendency of international actors to focus exclusively on military methods and giving impetus to efforts to operationalize protection in the field.
Peer Reviewed Yes
Published Yes
Alternative URI http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00729.x
Volume 84
Issue Number 4
Page from 615
Page to 639
ISSN 0020-5850
Date Accessioned 2011-05-09
Date Available 2011-08-30T06:22:14Z
Language en_AU
Research Centre Centre for Governance and Public Policy; Griffith Asia Institute
Faculty Griffith Business School
Subject International Relations
URI http://hdl.handle.net/10072/40490
Publication Type Journal Articles (Refereed Article)
Publication Type Code c1x

Brief Record

Griffith University copyright notice