The Responsibilities of Victory: Jus Post Bellum and the Just War

There are no files associated with this record.

Title The Responsibilities of Victory: Jus Post Bellum and the Just War
Author Bellamy, Alex J.
Journal Name Review of International Studies
Year Published 2008
Place of publication United Kingdom
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Abstract Recent years have seen a growing interest in questions about justice after war (jus post bellum), fuelled in large part by moral questions about coalition operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. As a result, it has become common to argue that jus post bellum is a third strand of Just War thinking. This article evaluates this position. It argues that that there are broadly two ways of understanding moral requirements after war: a minimalist position which holds that moral principles derived largely from jus ad bellum and jus in bello concerns should constrain what victors are entitled to do after war and a maximalist position which holds that victors acquire additional responsibilities that are grounded more in liberalism and international law than in Just War thinking. Finding problems with both approaches, the article argues that it is premature to include jus post bellum as a third element of Just War thinking and concludes by setting out six principles to guide future thinking in this area.
Peer Reviewed Yes
Published Yes
Alternative URI http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S026021050800819X
Volume 34
Issue Number 4
Page from 601
Page to 625
ISSN 0260-2105
Date Accessioned 2011-05-09
Date Available 2011-08-30T06:22:44Z
Language en_AU
Research Centre Centre for Governance and Public Policy; Griffith Asia Institute
Faculty Griffith Business School
Subject International Relations
URI http://hdl.handle.net/10072/40506
Publication Type Journal Articles (Refereed Article)
Publication Type Code c1x

Brief Record

Griffith University copyright notice