Mainstreaming the Responsibility to Protect in Peace Operations

There are no files associated with this record.

Title Mainstreaming the Responsibility to Protect in Peace Operations
Author Hunt, Charles T.; Bellamy, Alex J.
Journal Name Civil Wars
Year Published 2011
Place of publication United Kingdom
Publisher Routledge
Abstract The ‘Responsibility to Protect’ (RtoP) principle represents a commitment to prevent and halt mass atrocity crimes. However, in his 2009 report on implementing the RtoP, the UN Secretary-General noted that more work was needed to understand the measures that states might take to exercise their RtoP. Given that UN peace operations are now customarily mandated to ‘protect civilians under imminent threat of physical violence’, it would seem prudent to ask how peace operations can contribute to operationalising the RtoP and how the RtoP might support peacekeeping. This article explores the potential for implementing the RtoP through peace operations. It argues that the RtoP and peace operations are mutually reinforcing. Notwithstanding systemic challenges, peace operations offer a legitimate vehicle for implementing RtoP, whereas RtoP provides a facilitating norm for harnessing political will and buttressing the legitimacy and credibility of contemporary peace operations.
Peer Reviewed Yes
Published Yes
Alternative URI
Volume 13
Issue Number 1
Page from 1
Page to 20
ISSN 1369-8249
Date Accessioned 2011-07-28
Date Available 2015-06-12T05:01:43Z
Language en_US
Research Centre Centre for Governance and Public Policy; Griffith Asia Institute
Faculty Griffith Business School
Subject International Relations
Publication Type Journal Articles (Refereed Article)
Publication Type Code c1

Show simple item record

Griffith University copyright notice