On the Meaning of “Responsibility” in the "Responsibility to Protect”

File Size Format
74161_1.pdf 337Kb Adobe PDF View
Title On the Meaning of “Responsibility” in the "Responsibility to Protect”
Author Glanville, Luke
Journal Name Griffith Law Review
Year Published 2011
Place of publication Australia
Publisher Griffith University
Abstract The ʻresponsibility to protectʼ (RtoP) concept has emerged rapidly over the last decade to take a prominent place in international discussions about the protection of populations from mass atrocities. However, little attention has been paid to the meaning of the term ʻresponsibilityʼ in RtoP. ʻResponsibilityʼ is a slippery term that can perform a range of functions. This article suggests that, in order to understand the meaning of ʻresponsibilityʼ in RtoP, we need to examine three things: what actors are responsible for; who actors are responsible to; and the ways in which irresponsible actors may be held to account. Such examination enables us to comprehend better some of the key debates and dilemmas with which the RtoP principle continues to be confronted.
Peer Reviewed Yes
Published Yes
Publisher URI http://www.griffithreview.com/
Copyright Statement Copyright 2011 Griffith University & the Author. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. For information about this journal please refer to the journal’s website or contact the author.
Volume 20
Issue Number 2
Page from 482
Page to 504
ISSN 1038-3441
Date Accessioned 2011-11-15
Date Available 2012-05-16T22:20:18Z
Language en_US
Research Centre Centre for Governance and Public Policy; Griffith Asia Institute
Faculty Griffith Business School
Subject International Relations
URI http://hdl.handle.net/10072/41929
Publication Type Journal Articles (Refereed Article)
Publication Type Code c1

Brief Record

Griffith University copyright notice