Analysis and democracy: the antecedents of the deliberative approach of ecosystems valuation

File Size Format
74621_1.pdf 177Kb Adobe PDF View
Title Analysis and democracy: the antecedents of the deliberative approach of ecosystems valuation
Author Lo, Alex
Journal Name Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy
Year Published 2011
Place of publication United Kingdom
Publisher Pion
Abstract As a political institution, open deliberation on public policy can enhance legitimacy and procedural justice. As a science, decision-aiding deliberative procedures can help overcome bounded rationality of individuals. Integrating the two modes of inquiry would be perfect for capturing the plural values of the environment. However, the analytic requirements seem to point in a different direction from the political ideals. Legitimacy problems arise when the supposedly unconstrained process is professionally ‘guided’. But rigorous decision aids fail to work without some degree of cognitive guidance. A trend in ecosystems valuation research is the use of analytic techniques in the deliberative processes of value articulation. In this paper an analytic – deliberative approach is assessed against a deliberative democracy theory. This approach seeks to facilitate deliberation within individuals and to engineer preference towards instrumental rationality. The evaluative framework allows predetermination of the range of outcomes. Little room has been made for value debates, thus the moral need for actual discussion is weak. Being expert centred, the framework provides constricted spaces for empowerment. Alternative expressions unintelligible to the science may be put at a disadvantage. The scope for a reflexive democratic institution appears limited. A promising deliberative valuation approach should be integrative, including analytic and political elements as complementary to each other, and should be democratic in its production.
Peer Reviewed Yes
Published Yes
Alternative URI http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/c1083
Copyright Statement Copyright 2011 Pion Ltd., London. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version.
Volume 29
Page from 958
Page to 974
ISSN 0263-774X
Date Accessioned 2011-12-08
Date Available 2013-05-30T00:42:16Z
Language en_US
Research Centre Urban Research Program
Faculty Faculty of Science, Environment, Engineering and Technology
Subject Environment and Resource Economics; Political Theory and Political Philosophy
URI http://hdl.handle.net/10072/42685
Publication Type Journal Articles (Refereed Article)
Publication Type Code c1

Show simple item record

Griffith University copyright notice