Willingness of residents to pay and motives for conservation of urban green spaces in the compact city of Hong Kong
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 74607_1.pdf | 109Kb | Adobe PDF | View |
| Title | Willingness of residents to pay and motives for conservation of urban green spaces in the compact city of Hong Kong |
|---|---|
| Author | Lo, Alex; Jim, C.Y. |
| Journal Name | Urban Forestry & Urban Greening |
| Year Published | 2010 |
| Place of publication | Germany |
| Publisher | Urban und Fischer Verlag |
| Abstract | People attach multiple values to urban green spaces which play varied roles in cities. Properly designed monetary valuation surveys can ascertain their non-market value and underlying motives. This study investigates Hong Kong residents’ recreational use of urban green spaces and assesses the monetary value of these areas. A total of 495 urban residents from different neighbourhoods and socio-economic groups were interviewed. About 70% of the respondents visited urban green spaces at least weekly. Major companions during patronage were family members and then children. Exercises and clean air topped the list of visit purposes. The recreational pattern is associated with the cramped private living condition that pushes people to public open areas which are construed as extension of home space. The valuation question solicited overwhelming support, with over 80% of the respondents willing to pay to recover a possible loss of urban green spaces area by 20%. It yielded a monthly average payment of HK$77.43 (approx. 9.90 USD) per household for five years. Non-instrumental aspects played some role in the respondents’ bidding decision. The findings could assist green space planning and nature conservation, and hinted the need to consider the pluralistic community views and expectations in relevant public policies. |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Published | Yes |
| Alternative URI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2010.01.001 |
| Copyright Statement | Copyright 2010 Elsevier GmbH. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version. |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue Number | 2 |
| Page from | 113 |
| Page to | 120 |
| ISSN | 1610-8167 |
| Date Accessioned | 2011-12-07 |
| Date Available | 2012-06-04T22:49:34Z |
| Language | en_US |
| Research Centre | Urban Research Program |
| Faculty | Faculty of Science, Environment, Engineering and Technology |
| Subject | Environment and Resource Economics; Land Use and Environmental Planning |
| URI | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/42791 |
| Publication Type | Journal Articles (Refereed Article) |
| Publication Type Code | c1x |
Please use this identifier to cite this record: http://hdl.handle.net/10072/42791
Griffith University copyright notice
Copyright in individual works within the repository belongs to their authors or publishers. You may make a print or digital copy of a work for your personal non-commercial use. All other rights are reserved, except for fair dealings or other user rights granted by the copyright laws of your country.
Back to top