Skills development for employability (TVET) in higher education: issues and challenges
There are no files associated with this record.
| Title | Skills development for employability (TVET) in higher education: issues and challenges |
|---|---|
| Author | Maclean, Rupert; Pavlova, Margarita B. |
| Journal Name | Journal of Asian Public Policy |
| Year Published | 2011 |
| Place of publication | United Kingdom |
| Publisher | Routledge |
| Abstract | Historically, technical and vocational education and training (TVET) and higher education (HE) emerged from opposing traditions, with the universities providing academic knowledge and TVET providing skills for employability. Mass and elite HE and vocational institutions have developed complex relationships in many countries. Even European Union capitalist countries such as Germany and the United Kingdom have different approaches to HE and TVET. With the trend of the massification of HE, universities are increasingly moving away from the tradition of mainly producing and transmitting academic knowledge and are putting emphasis on skills development for employability. This has resulted in a move towards the vocationalization of HE and the bridging of academic and vocational learning. In this article, Luhmann’s theory of society is used to consider the relationships between TVET and HE. These can be analysed in terms of a self-organizing (autopoietic) system that was developed by Luhmann in 1984. In accordance with this theory, satisfaction of industry’s needs through the development of personal skills by means of university training would be harmonized through the function of stabilization in the time dimension. The dynamics of this are developed through communication. Luhmann (1984, Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp (Translated version printed in 1995)) specified that the relations between the social communication system and what he called ‘individual consciousness systems’ (i.e. actors) are ‘structurally coupled’: the social communication system cannot operate without individuals who communicate, but only the message (i.e. the action) and not the actor is communicated. The action will thus have different meanings for the sending actor, for the receiving actor and for the social communication system, since they are different systems of reference. The social system has its own dynamics and gradually universities could be harmonized with the market economy. This article refers to the current discourses on vocation and HE relationships that can be viewed on four levels – political, economic, epistemological and human development. |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Published | Yes |
| Alternative URI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2011.630226 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue Number | 3 |
| Page from | 321 |
| Page to | 330 |
| ISSN | 1751-6234 |
| Date Accessioned | 2011-12-19; 2012-03-21T23:23:24Z |
| Date Available | 2012-03-21T23:23:24Z |
| Research Centre | Griffith Institute for Educational Research |
| Faculty | Arts, Education and Law |
| Subject | Higher Education; Technical, Further and Workplace Education |
| URI | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/43781 |
| Publication Type | Journal Articles (Refereed Article) |
| Publication Type Code | c1 |
Please use this identifier to cite this record: http://hdl.handle.net/10072/43781
Griffith University copyright notice
Copyright in individual works within the repository belongs to their authors or publishers. You may make a print or digital copy of a work for your personal non-commercial use. All other rights are reserved, except for fair dealings or other user rights granted by the copyright laws of your country.
Back to top