Towards an object-relations theory of consumerism: The aesthetics of desire and the unfolding materiality of social life
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 75142_1.pdf | 117Kb | Adobe PDF | View |
| Title | Towards an object-relations theory of consumerism: The aesthetics of desire and the unfolding materiality of social life |
|---|---|
| Author | Woodward, Ian Stuart |
| Journal Name | Journal of Consumer Culture |
| Year Published | 2011 |
| Place of publication | United Kingdom |
| Publisher | Sage Publications |
| Abstract | This paper addresses some fundamental questions in the field of consumption studies through an exploration of literatures within object-relations psychoanalytic theory. It takes materiality as its central concern, dealing especially with questions of actor– commodity relations. In particular the paper uses the conceptual apparatus of the object-relations approach to propose a new way for theorizing aspects of consumption practice relating to person–object relationships. After situating the discussion within contemporary debates in consumption studies, the paper uses DWWinnicott’s work as a point from which to integrate broader literatures on aesthetic experience and subject– object relations. The paper draws out the cultural implications and affinities of Winnicott’s model and argues that his approach usefully suggests pathways for developing a model of consumption which neither reduces person–object exchanges to the psyche, assemblages of practices, or to the dead hand of social-structural forces. Rather, it is argued that Winnicott’s model is suggestive of the more widespread and powerful cultural implications arising from relations between actors and objects of consumption. |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Published | Yes |
| Alternative URI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1469540511417997 |
| Copyright Statement | Copyright 2011 SAGE Publications. This is the author-manuscript version of the paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version. |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue Number | 3 |
| Page from | 366 |
| Page to | 384 |
| ISSN | 1469-5405 |
| Date Accessioned | 2012-01-16 |
| Date Available | 2012-12-04T23:13:35Z |
| Language | en_US |
| Research Centre | Griffith Centre for Cultural Research |
| Faculty | Arts, Education and Law |
| Subject | Social Theory |
| URI | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/43960 |
| Publication Type | Journal Articles (Refereed Article) |
| Publication Type Code | c1 |
Please use this identifier to cite this record: http://hdl.handle.net/10072/43960
Griffith University copyright notice
Copyright in individual works within the repository belongs to their authors or publishers. You may make a print or digital copy of a work for your personal non-commercial use. All other rights are reserved, except for fair dealings or other user rights granted by the copyright laws of your country.
Back to top