Towards a Global Carbon Integrity System: Learning from the GFC1 and Avoiding a GCC2
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 76802_1.pdf | 87Kb | Adobe PDF | View |
| Title | Towards a Global Carbon Integrity System: Learning from the GFC1 and Avoiding a GCC2 |
|---|---|
| Author | Sampford, Charles John |
| Journal Name | Low Carbon Economy |
| Year Published | 2011 |
| Place of publication | United States |
| Publisher | Scientific Research Publishing |
| Abstract | This paper examines some of the central global ethical and governance challenges of climate change and carbon emis-sions reduction in relation to globalization, the “global financial crisis” (GFC), and unsustainable conceptions of the “good life”, and argues in favour of the development of a global carbon “integrity system”. It is argued that a funda-mental driver of our climate problems is the incipient spread of an unsustainable Western version of the “good life”, where resource-intensive, high-carbon western lifestyles, although frequently criticized as unsustainable and deeply unsatisfying, appear to have established an unearned ethical legitimacy. While the ultimate solution to climate change is the development of low carbon lifestyles, the paper argues that it is also important that economic incentives support and stimulate that search: the sustainable versions of the good life provide an ethical pull, whilst the incentives provide an economic push. Yet, if we are going to secure sustainable low carbon lifestyles, it is argued, we need more than the ethical pull and the economic push. Each needs to be institutionalized—built into the governance of global, regional, national, sub-regional, corporate and professional institutions. Where currently weakness in each exacerbates the weaknesses in others, it is argued that governance reform is required in all areas supporting sustainable, low carbon versions of the good life. |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Published | Yes |
| Alternative URI | http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/lce.2011.24026 |
| Copyright Statement | Copyright 2011 Scientific Research Publishing. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal website for access to the definitive, published version. |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue Number | 4 |
| Page from | 210 |
| Page to | 219 |
| ISSN | 2158-7000 |
| Date Accessioned | 2012-02-28 |
| Date Available | 2012-06-26T22:52:21Z |
| Language | en_US |
| Research Centre | Key Centre for Ethics, Law, Justice and Governance |
| Faculty | Arts, Education and Law |
| Subject | Environment Policy |
| URI | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/44865 |
| Publication Type | Journal Articles (Refereed Article) |
| Publication Type Code | c1 |
Please use this identifier to cite this record: http://hdl.handle.net/10072/44865
Griffith University copyright notice
Copyright in individual works within the repository belongs to their authors or publishers. You may make a print or digital copy of a work for your personal non-commercial use. All other rights are reserved, except for fair dealings or other user rights granted by the copyright laws of your country.
Back to top