Australian Responses to 9/11: New World Legal Hybrids?

There are no files associated with this record.

Title Australian Responses to 9/11: New World Legal Hybrids?
Author Bronitt, Simon H.; Donkin, Susan
Book Title Post 9/11 and the State of Permanent Legal Emergency: Security and Human Rights in Countering Terrorism
Editor Aniceto Masferrer
Year Published 2012
Place of publication Germany
Publisher Springer
Abstract The terrorist attacks which occurred in the United States on 11 September 2001 have profoundly altered and reshaped the priorities of criminal justice systems around the world. Atrocities like the 9/11 attacks, the Madrid train bombings of March 2004, and the terrorist act to the United Kingdom of July 2005 threatened the life of democratic nations as well as its residents. This book is devoted to exploring a problem which has been recurrent at times of crisis and must be constantly deliberately as new threats emerge: the necessity of limiting State power to protect individuals, including non-citizens. Accordingly, it is important to recognize human rights which exist prior to the State. These pre-political or natural rights lie beyond the siren song of sovereignty and are not negotiable whether through legislation, executive power (or otherwise). Protecting these rights, as conceived in law, curtails the excessive exercise of State power. The recognition of the pre-political character of human rights poses objective limits both to the State itself and to the exercise of State authority, precluding in the 9/11 era for all States sooner or later (later for the militarily mighty) counter terrorism tactics which involve unending and capricious derogations from rights or even the setting aside of non-derogable rights. In countering terrorism, the State is not allowed to exercise unrestrained power. It may not rely on a supposed national or popular sovereignty or even on the legitimacy of the democratic process. While establishing limits on State power and lawmaking may not completely resolve the complex relationship between national security and the protection of fundamental rights, it may moderate the State’s often excessive utilitarian approach which, focusing more on the quantum than on quod, ignores the pre-political dimension of human rights and trivializes – if not ignores – the dignity of each human being, leaving him/her unprotected from the absolute power of Leviathan.
Peer Reviewed Yes
Published Yes
Alternative URI http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4062-4_10
Chapter Number 10
Page from 223
Page to 240
ISBN 9789400740617
Date Accessioned 2012-06-18; 2012-08-12T23:18:39Z
Date Available 2012-08-12T23:18:39Z
Research Centre ARC Centre of Excellence in Policing and Security
Faculty Arts, Education and Law
Subject Law and Legal Studies
URI http://hdl.handle.net/10072/46225
Publication Type Book Chapters
Publication Type Code b1

Show simple item record

Griffith University copyright notice