Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDekker, Sidney
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-19
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-01T23:26:02Z
dc.date.available2017-03-01T23:26:02Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.modified2012-09-04T22:30:19Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/46628
dc.description.abstractA series of surveys on accident investigation models show a wide variety of models, dedicated to specific industrial applications, domains and investigation aspects. In particular the investigation of human factors is exposed to a wide diversity of models. In reviewing such models, the majority proves to be a derivate from the Reason’s Swiss Cheese causation model or the Rasmussen model on system hierarchy. Most of the models origin from the process industry and the energy sector. Application in the aviation industry has revealed their conceptual limitations. Due to their simplifications and lay interpretations, their intervention potential in practice is limited to linear solutions. In order to cope with socio-technological interactions in a multi-actor perspective, a full systems engineering design approach should be applied in a mission specific operating envelope. Such an approach is submitted to three paradigmatic shifts in investigation methodology. First; disengagement is required between event modelling and systems modelling. Second; a distinction in two design classes is required. A distinction is made between linear interventions within the existing design envelope and second order interventions focusing on expansion of the design solution space. Third; designing safer solutions in a multi-actor systems environment requires prototyping, virtual system model simulation and testing of limit state scenarios. Based on these constraints, a framework for safety enhancement is described, derived from experiences in the aviation industry itself. This framework is based on a new view on human error, a dynamic systems engineering design approach, analytical forensic abilities and institutional conditions for independent and qualified accident investigations.
dc.description.peerreviewedNo
dc.description.publicationstatusYes
dc.format.extent129476 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherHuman Factors and Ergonomics Society Europe Chapter Annual Meeting
dc.publisher.placeLinköping, Sweden
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.hfes-europe.org/
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationN
dc.relation.ispartofconferencenameHuman Factors and Ergonomics Society Europe Chapter Annual Meeting
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitleHuman Factors and Ergonomics Society Europe Chapter Annual Meeting
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2009-10-14
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2009-10-16
dc.relation.ispartoflocationLinköping, Sweden
dc.rights.retentionY
dc.subject.fieldofresearchHealth Policy
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode160508
dc.titleIn the systems view of human factors, who is responsible for success and failure?
dc.typeConference output
dc.type.descriptionE2 - Conferences (Non Refereed)
dc.type.codee2x
gro.facultyArts, Education and Law
gro.rights.copyright© 2009 Shaker Publishing. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the conference's website for access to the definitive, published version.
gro.date.issued2009
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorDekker, Sidney


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record