Semantic primes, semantic molecules, semantic templates: Key concepts in the NSM approach to lexical typology
There are no files associated with this record.
| Title | Semantic primes, semantic molecules, semantic templates: Key concepts in the NSM approach to lexical typology |
|---|---|
| Author | Goddard, Cliff William |
| Journal Name | Linguistics |
| Year Published | 2012 |
| Place of publication | Germany |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter |
| Abstract | The Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) approach has a long track record in cross- linguistic lexical semantics (Wierzbicka 1992, 1996, 1999; Goddard 1998, 2005, 2006, 2008; Harkins and Wierzbicka 2001; Goddard and Wierzbicka 2002; Peeters 2006; Gladkova 2010; Ye 2007a, 2007b, 2010; Bromhead 2009, 2011; Wong 2005, 2010; and other works). It is therefore not surprising that it has a clear theoretical position on key issues in lexical semantic typology and a well-developed set of analytical techniques. From a theoretical point of view, the overriding issue concerns the tertium comparationis. What are the optimal concepts and categories to support the systematic investigation of lexicons and lexicological phenomena across the world’s languages? To this question, the NSM approach offers the following answer: the necessary concepts can—and must—be based on the shared lexical-conceptual core of all languages, which NSM researchers claim to have discovered over the course of a thirty-five year program of empirical cross-linguistic semantics. This shared lexical- conceptual core is the mini-language of semantic primes and their associated grammar. In addition, over the past 10 or so years, NSM researchers have developed certain original analytical constructs which promise to enhance the power and systematicity of the approach: in particular, the notions of semantic molecules and semantic templates. This paper sets out to explain and illustrate these notions, to report some key analytical findings (updated, in many cases, from previously published accounts), and to extrapolate their implications for the further development of lexical typology. |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Published | Yes |
| Alternative URI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ling-2012-0022 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue Number | 3 |
| Page from | 711 |
| Page to | 743 |
| ISSN | 1613-396X |
| Date Accessioned | 2012-06-19; 2012-09-21T04:27:50Z |
| Date Available | 2012-09-21T04:27:50Z |
| Faculty | Arts, Education and Law |
| Subject | Linguistic Structures (incl Grammar, Phonology, Lexicon, Semantics) |
| URI | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/46996 |
| Publication Type | Journal Articles (Refereed Article) |
| Publication Type Code | c1 |
Please use this identifier to cite this record: http://hdl.handle.net/10072/46996
Griffith University copyright notice
Copyright in individual works within the repository belongs to their authors or publishers. You may make a print or digital copy of a work for your personal non-commercial use. All other rights are reserved, except for fair dealings or other user rights granted by the copyright laws of your country.
Back to top