Shifting frontiers of control during closedown processes
There are no files associated with this record.
| Title | Shifting frontiers of control during closedown processes |
|---|---|
| Author | Wigblad, Rune; Hannson, Magnus; Townsend, Keith John; Lewer, John |
| Journal Name | Personnel Review |
| Year Published | 2012 |
| Place of publication | United Kingdom |
| Publisher | Emerald |
| Abstract | Purpose – This paper aims to explore and analyse how shifting frontiers of control emerge and change the labour process so that restrictions to output become diminished, subsequently affecting organisational performance. Design/methodology/approach – Multiple case study design. Interviews with 104 respondents. Analysis of productivity statistics in order to test for the statistical significance of the closedown effect. Single multiple regression analysis of the comparative strength, of the closedown effect, between cases. Findings – Shifting frontiers of control arise during the closedown process, a control system characterised by markedly unrestricted autonomy for the workers as the management frontiers of control abate. This provides an operative space for informal work practices, innovation and emerging new industrial relations, accounting for the higher levels of output. Research limitations/implications – A multiple case study of three different manufacturing organisations, with comparably long closedown periods. The authors do not analyse the sustainability of the increase in output or the generalisibility of the closedown effect to other industries. Practical implications – It is possible to anticipate improved productivity if shifting frontiers of control are rapidly replacing the old. If management abandons the old control mechanisms, previous to the closedown decision, and provides operative space for workers' initiatives and informal leadership during the closedown process, it is possible to expect good performance, enabling a scope for extended closedown periods. Originality/value – This is the first study that analyses the comparative strength of the closedown effect and how restricted work practices change under the process of closedown. |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Published | Yes |
| Alternative URI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00483481211200015 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue Number | 2 |
| Page from | 160 |
| Page to | 179 |
| ISSN | 0048-3486 |
| Date Accessioned | 2012-06-07 |
| Date Available | 2013-06-03T00:27:35Z |
| Language | en_US |
| Research Centre | Centre for Work, Organisation and Wellbeing |
| Faculty | Griffith Business School |
| Subject | Industrial Relations |
| URI | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/47088 |
| Publication Type | Journal Articles (Refereed Article) |
| Publication Type Code | c1 |
Please use this identifier to cite this record: http://hdl.handle.net/10072/47088
Griffith University copyright notice
Copyright in individual works within the repository belongs to their authors or publishers. You may make a print or digital copy of a work for your personal non-commercial use. All other rights are reserved, except for fair dealings or other user rights granted by the copyright laws of your country.
Back to top