Spinal loads during two-person team lifting: effect of matched versus unmatched standing height

There are no files associated with this record.

Title Spinal loads during two-person team lifting: effect of matched versus unmatched standing height
Author Dennis, Gary John; Barrett, Rod
Journal Name International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
Year Published 2003
Place of publication Netherlands
Publisher Elsevier Science BV
Abstract The purpose of this experiment was to compare spinal loads during two-person lifting tasks performed with team members of matched versus unmatched standing height. Twelve young healthy male subjects performed matched and unmatched team lifts with two box masses (30 and 60 kg) and three initial box heights (0, 20 and 40 cm). All lifts were performed in the sagittal plane with a self-selected lifting technique from the initial box height to standing knuckle height. The box was instrumented with force transducers that measured horizontal and vertical hand forces, whilst sagittal plane segmental kinematics were determined using a video-based motion measurement system. Dynamic L4/L5 torques were calculated and used in a single equivalent extensor force model of the lumbar spine to estimate L4/L5 compression and shear forces. No significant differences were found in the maximum torque, compression or shear forces at L4/L5 between lifts performed with team members of matched or unmatched height. However, in the last part of the unmatched lifting condition the box was located closer to the short subject, which caused the reactive L4/L5 torque to decrease for short subjects and increase for tall subjects. Average (but not peak) L4/L5 torque and compression force were therefore significantly lower for short subjects and significantly higher for tall subjects in the unmatched compared to the matched lifting condition. However, the larger spinal load incurred by the tall subjects at the end of the unmatched compared to matched lifts are unlikely to drastically alter the risk of spinal injury caused by acute loading, since they were only one-third of the maximal spinal load that occurred during the lift and were below the NIOSH Action Limit. Despite this matching team member height may still be important for decreasing cumulative loading during repetitive lifting.
Peer Reviewed Yes
Published Yes
Publisher URI http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505654/description#description
Copyright Statement Copyright 2003 Elsevier : Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher : This journal is available online - use hypertext links.
Volume 32
Page from 25
Page to 38
ISSN 0169-8141
Date Accessioned 2004-01-08
Language en_AU
Research Centre Griffith Health Institute; Centre for Musculoskeletal Research
Faculty Griffith Health Faculty
Subject Biomechanics
URI http://hdl.handle.net/10072/6181
Publication Type Journal Articles (Refereed Article)
Publication Type Code c1

Show simple item record

Griffith University copyright notice