Light degrading properties of size-fractionated PM10 aerosol samples collected from an industrial area in Brisbane, Australia.
There are no files associated with this record.
| Title | Light degrading properties of size-fractionated PM10 aerosol samples collected from an industrial area in Brisbane, Australia. |
|---|---|
| Author | Chan, Andrew Yiu Chung; McTainsh, Grant Harvey; Simpson, R. W.; Vowles, Peter David; Cohen, D. D.; Bailey, G. M. |
| Journal Name | Aerosol Science and Technology |
| Year Published | 2002 |
| Place of publication | USA |
| Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
| Abstract | Thirty-seven days of PM 10 aerosol samples (particles with aerodynamic diameter <10 μm) were collected in an industrial area in Brisbane during April to June 1999 to study the light extinction efficiencies of urban aerosols in different size ranges. The light scattering coefficient of the air was measured by nephelometry. The light absorption coefficient of the aerosol samples was measured by the integrating plate laser absorption method. Multiple linear regression techniques were used to investigate the relationships between the visibility degrading properties and the chemical composition of the aerosol samples. The results are comparable with those from other visual air quality studies. The absorption of light by fine (PM 2.5 ) aerosols is mainly due to elemental carbon (EC) particles smaller than 0.5 μm. The b 0 ap values of EC particles in different size ranges are 9.08 (< 2.7 μm) and 0.32 (2.7-10 μm)m 2 g -1 , respectively. The absorption of light by coarse (PM 2.5-10 ) aerosols is mainly due to soil ( b 0 ap = 0.17) and organic ( b 0 ap = 1.11) particles. The scattering of light is highly related to the concentration of fine particles in the air (mass scattering efficiency b 0 sp = 1.65) and is mainly due to the fine sulphate ( b 0 sp = 10.9), soil ( b 0 sp = 2.73), and EC ( b 0 sp = 3.89) particles. On average, fine EC (44%), sulphate (20%) and soil (7%) particles, NO 2 (9%), and Rayleigh scattering (19%) were the largest contributors of visibility degradation for the sampling days in this study. |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Published | Yes |
| Publisher URI | http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~db=all~content=t713656376 |
| Alternative URI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820290038537 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Page from | 890 |
| Page to | 898 |
| ISSN | 0278-6826 |
| Date Accessioned | 2003-03-03 |
| Date Available | 2009-10-01T05:57:25Z |
| Language | en_AU |
| Research Centre | Atmospheric Environment Research Centre |
| Faculty | Faculty of Environmental Sciences |
| Subject | PRE2009-Environmental Chemistry (incl. Atmospheric Chemistry) |
| URI | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/6764 |
| Publication Type | Journal Articles (Refereed Article) |
| Publication Type Code | c1 |
Please use this identifier to cite this record: http://hdl.handle.net/10072/6764
Griffith University copyright notice
Copyright in individual works within the repository belongs to their authors or publishers. You may make a print or digital copy of a work for your personal non-commercial use. All other rights are reserved, except for fair dealings or other user rights granted by the copyright laws of your country.
Back to top